Clinical Consultation

The Clinical Consultation page is an opportunity for the practicing optometrist to consult with well-known colleagues.   A second opinion is only a click away. 
E-mail us your questions, and watch for the answers

 Submit questions here

The opinions posted on this page are based solely upon the information received in each e-mail.  Since patients have not been personally observed, physician discretion should be used BEFORE utilizing any advice given here.

                 Consultants

Anterior Segment/Glaucoma/Refractive Surgery/
Contact Lenses

  Jim Colgain OD
  Mike DePaolis OD
  Eric Donnenfeld MD
  Art Epstein OD
  John Kanellopoulos MD
  Albert M. Morier OD
  Gary Oliver OD
  Robert Ryan OD
  Jim Thimons OD
Low Vision
  Joe Maino OD
  Albert M. Morier OD
Pediatrics/Binocular Vision/Computer Vision Syndrome

  Dominic Maino OD
 
Jeffrey Anshel OD
Posterior Segment

  John Potter OD
Practice Management
  Gary Gerber OD
Technology
  Walt Mayo OD

Questions

Question List...  

Clinical pearls of fitting the soft bifocal contact lens
Panel discussion
Moderator- Al Morier OD
Panel- Bill Leahey OD, Roy Kline OD, Carolee Boyd OD, Ed Alexander OD, Tom Morrissey OD

The November ENYOS meeting was a round table discussion of the fitting techniques of the acuvue bifocal. This format, where several experienced practitioners discuss their philosophies, can be a very effective method for our members to sharpen their skills. As the meeting was sparsely attended, we will try to bring out the major points that were discussed to aid our members who could not make the meeting. 

My first experience with the lens left me feeling that it was another poor soft bifocal lens attempt.  My patient’s were complaining about distance blur that I didn’t expect due to the pre-launch information I received by the sales rep.  However, due to the great demand that Vistakon’s advertisements and the brochures in the waiting area generated, I had no choice but to make another attempt.  Patient feedback guided me into a fairly successful fitting pattern. 

The acuvue bifocal does not give perfect distance and near acuity.  We still must select the appropriate candidates based largely on their motivation to be free from glasses. I think the most important aspect of being successful is preparing the patient for the mild decrease in acuity that they will experience. I tell the patient that a contact which is dedicated solely to distance acuity will be virtually 100% clear and the bifocal contact has central annular rings which allow them to focus at near. I appeal to their logic that, obviously, this lens will therefore have a slightly reduced distance acuity due to these central near zones. Thus, when they put the contact on their responses are “the vision isn’t THAT bad”.  I explain that even though it is not as perfect for distance as a distance contact it does allow them to see at near. Ed Alexander noted that they may not think it is worth it until they go back to the DV contacts and then see that they don’t see squat at near.  I find this to be absolutely true. Thus, I don’t find myself apologizing for the DV blur but rather recognizing that it is a natural and expected fact of life.  Much as bifocal eyeglass lenses blur the ground as we look down.  The availability of the fitting set right in the office makes adjusting of the powers very easy.  A major reason why I stayed away from promoting bifocal contacts was the hassle and time my staff spent on returning lenses, credit memos, etc.  I used to fit patient which regular bifocal contacts and after the patient was relatively happy, I would make them sign a non-disclosure agreement not to tell their friends where they got them.

It was generally agreed that we all use a form of modified monovision where we decrease the add power of the dominant eye so as to blur the DV as little as possible. This, I found to be the key to my increase in patient satisfaction.  If my patient needs a +1.75 add, I put a +100 add on the dominant eye and a +1.50 on the non-dominant eye. If they need more at near I would raise the +1.50 add to +2.00, depending on their reaction, I may or may not raise the dominant eye to +1.50.  It was generally agreed that the +2.50 D adds caused significant DV blur and were seldom used binocularly.  A clinical pearl from Vistakon is to add a -0.25 D to the distance power when using the higher adds. I made the point that even though the DV or NV acuity may not be adequate for a particular patient’s job, ie. Truck driver or CPA, they still may wish to use them part time for going out to dinner. Thus, don’t make any assumptions for the patient. I tried to do this myself when I tried a pair on the office manager at the Lion’s Eye Institute who has a plano OU rx with 20/15 acuity. She complained that the DV was not good for driving and I responded, “oh, well it was a shot”, and she said, “so what, I just take them off before I drive home!”.

The comfort of the lens is excellent although it is thin and somewhat difficult to handle.  The 1-2-3 inversion mark is very difficult to see and we were informed that Vistakon is considering other avenues.  As the age of these wearers is over 40, complaints of dry eye are going to be common. Remember to try a collagen punctal implant to see the effectiveness of punctal occlusion in relieving these symptoms.  I have a good supply of collagen sleeves samples that I would be happy to send out to members wishing to try this. Any member of ENYOS who wishes to learn punctal occlusion is welcome to come to my office for personal instruction. 

We discussed the new acuvue 2 contact lens and agreed that it is an extraordinary product. The comfort and handling were excellent. I don’t think it fills a void as much as the AV bifocal but it is still a good product especially in the low minus range. 

Roy Kline and Carolee Boyd reported that they have had significant success with the AV bifocal. They reported that for people with astigmatism, the toric Westcon lens works great, maybe better than a spherical fit. This surprised me as I never even tried it on a patient, assuming it couldn’t possibly work. They, also, told the panel that the Lifestyle RGP provided excellent results for patients who are in rigid lenses. Roy suggested that these lenses must be fit steep to provide good centration and function. Their favorite multi-focal RGP, however,  is the Boston Multivision, especially in adds less than +1.50 D.  Roy and Carolee suggested using the direct ophthalmoscope, with a +8 lens,  to see the central zone of the lens and if you can’t get good centration, forget it. These are great clinical pearls that I took away from the meeting.  

This open panel discussion format worked pretty well and each of us took away good clinical information. The next meeting will be in January and will be held at 7 PM at the Lion’s Eye Institute, 35 Hackett Blvd. The meeting will be in the first floor conference room. I will be presenting information about the new mast cell stabilizer, Zaditor, from Ciba Vision Ophthalmics. I have already used this on half a dozen patients, even though we are not in allergy season, and it has been very effective. Sai Gandham MD and Reza Mozayeni MD will each present a few cases which we have seen and found to be interesting and instructive.  Pizza and soda will be provided. Please RSVP, if you can, to Maureen at 262-2540 so that we can provide enough food.

Al Morier OD

I heard about a new drug from Ciba for allergies. What is it it and how does it work?

Dave Rojek OD
Saratoga Springs NY

Answer:
Zaditor (Ketotifen Fumarate) has just been released from Ciba Vision Ophthalmics. It is a mast cell stabilizer as well as a selective, potent (H1) anti-histamine. It ,also, seems to inhibit the release and activation of eosinophils. Eosinophils are a leukocyte which is drawn to the site of an allergic reaction and contains cytotoxic proteins. There is evidence that they are linked to corneal allergic disease (vernal). I have only prescribed it for 6 patients so far, which is alot for this time of year, but it has been quite effective. It is prescribed BID and should be used before and after contact lens use as the preservative, benzalkonium chloride, will be absorbed into the contact. The information released by Ciba states that this has been used used as an asthma medication safely for 20 years and it is safe for pediatric use.

Albert M. Morier OD
Albany Medical College
Albany NY

I have a refractive sx patient who did not get follow up until 6 weeks after the sx as she 'got a deal' The deal was 4 hours away and it turned out there was no follow up included.  Her vision is 20/40 OU with little refractive error but her eyes are deadly dry. I put her on Thera Tears and plugged her with punctal plugs.  Any other suggestions?

Gary Matisson OD
Gloversville NY

Answer:
Dryness in refractive surgery patients is a common and "temporary:" side effect of the surgery. Patients at greater risk include females over 40, CRT workers, those on antihistamines and other drying medications, those in dry climates, high altitudes, etc. treatment: Liberal artificial tears. Thera tears is our "ace in the hole" artificial tear. Plugs are not uncommon to see used particularly in dry climates, in the winters (Denver). Steve Slade, in Houston, speaks about Human Albumin Tears, that he has made up for patients in the most intractable cases. You may want to try this.
The bottom line is that everybody gets dry eyes following the procedure, it is temporary and those patients who had dry eyes prior to the procedure will experience greater symptoms during the healing time and will need to use supplements or the cascade of therapy you have initiated. 
If the vision is only 20/40 BCVA, and there is massive stippling, then that explains it, if not stippling then I would suspect striae or irregular astigmatism and do a topo, and eval as to why the inability to correct to 20/20

JIM
Jim Colgain, OD

Back to Top  -  Back to List

Web designed, maintained & hosted by: Rainbow Flair

1999 - 2007 All rights reserved, Primary Care Optometry